Mediasaurs.com Forum Index Mediasaurs.com
BADASS MOVIE REVIEWS AND DISCUSSION
 
 HomeHome   FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

CLASH OF THE TITANS
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Mediasaurs.com Forum Index -> Movies

Advertisements
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Mediasaurusrex
OLD SCHOOL MEDIASAUR PLAYER


Joined: 24 Jul 2003
Posts: 3581

PostPosted: Fri May 01, 2009 9:23 am    Post subject: CLASH OF THE TITANS Reply with quote

Is filming.

Wow.

If I was Ray Harryhausen, I would be irritated.

Geek Tyrant dropped the following info:

Leading the international cast is Australian actor Sam Worthington as Perseus, the mortal son of Zeus, king of the gods. Worthington will next be seen in this summer’s “Terminator Salvation.” Liam Neeson takes on the role of the mighty Zeus, and Ralph Fiennes plays the role of Hades, god of the underworld, who feeds on human fear. Rounding out the cast is Gemma Arterton (”Quantum of Solace”) as Io, Perseus’ mysterious spiritual guide throughout his journey; Mads Mikkelsen (”Casino Royale”) as Draco, who takes up his sword to join Perseus’ quest; Jason Flemyng (”The Curious Case of Benjamin Button”) as Acrisius, a one-time king-turned-hideous beast; and Alexa Davalos (”Defiance”) as Andromeda, a princess doomed to lose her life if Perseus does not succeed.



There are set pics with the full article HERE I didn't photobucket them because they aren't exciting at all.
_________________
www.mediasaurs.com MADASFOK
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Mediasaurusrex
OLD SCHOOL MEDIASAUR PLAYER


Joined: 24 Jul 2003
Posts: 3581

PostPosted: Mon Jun 01, 2009 10:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

SAM WORTHINGTON AS PERSEUS:


_________________
www.mediasaurs.com MADASFOK
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Spinal Villain
METALSAUR


Joined: 18 Sep 2008
Posts: 782
Location: UrAnus.

PostPosted: Tue Jun 02, 2009 7:50 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

SIGH....
_________________
Dirtdiver
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Trapani
MCP


Joined: 01 Aug 2008
Posts: 618

PostPosted: Tue Jun 02, 2009 8:17 am    Post subject: Re: CLASH OF THE TITANS Reply with quote

Mediasaurusrex wrote:


Liam Neeson takes on the role of the mighty Zeus


WRONG, should have been Mickey Rourke as Zeus.


Mediasaurusrex wrote:

and Ralph Fiennes plays the role of Hades, god of the underworld, who feeds on human fear.

WRONG, should have been Mickey Rourke as Hades.

I know they can't cast him in both roles, but they could have at least got one right.
MADASFOK
_________________
Fokkin managing aircraft and I am mad as fok MADASFOK
In the year 2084, robots came, and we needed BIG F-IN GUNS.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mediasaurusrex
OLD SCHOOL MEDIASAUR PLAYER


Joined: 24 Jul 2003
Posts: 3581

PostPosted: Tue Jun 02, 2009 9:58 am    Post subject: Re: CLASH OF THE TITANS Reply with quote

Trapani wrote:


I know they can't cast him in both roles, but they could have at least got one right.
MADASFOK


They can't cast him in both roles. WHY? They should have cast him in all 3. Perseus, Zeus and Hades. POINT BLANK MADASFOK

ROURKE IS MANLY ENOUGH TO DO IT AND PULL OFF A 60 MILLION OPENING WEEKEND MADASFOK

He would probably do it all for under 20 mil too.
_________________
www.mediasaurs.com MADASFOK
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
sithlord
DARK LORDASAUR


Joined: 16 Sep 2008
Posts: 717
Location: Right here

PostPosted: Tue Jun 02, 2009 12:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

This is currently the funniest and best movie thread we have.

I should've made it. MADASFOK


Liam Neeson will make a good, (towering) manly Zeus IMHO. Neeson can bring in the maniless.

Rourke as Hades or Perseus should've also been a given in this equation.

I really like the original, so this re-make (of FAILure) had better be damned good for me to even acknowledge it in theaters or DVD.























*Follows trend*









MADASFOK
_________________
Royal GRoyal G Sith's EmperorVader Royal GRoyal G
StormtrooperStormtrooperStormtrooperStormtrooperStormtrooperStormtrooperStormtrooper
StormtrooperStormtrooperStormtrooperStormtrooperStormtrooperStormtrooperStormtrooper
StormtrooperStormtrooperStormtrooperMADASFOKStormtrooperStormtrooperStormtrooper
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Mediasaurusrex
OLD SCHOOL MEDIASAUR PLAYER


Joined: 24 Jul 2003
Posts: 3581

PostPosted: Tue Jun 02, 2009 3:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Rourke vs Neeson?

ROURKE HANDS FORKING DOWN MADASFOK

I don't know that Mr. Taken can do it. Actually, MR. TAKEN MAKES ME ANGREEEEEEE MADASFOK

Rourke as the king of gods is beyond fitting. MADASFOK

Rourke as the man with the ballage to handle a wench like medusa is on-point. MADASFOK

Rourke as the god of the underworld is a foregone conclusion. MADASFOK

*forwards thread to b*tches who are sullying the good CLASH OF THE TITANS name*

MADASFOK
_________________
www.mediasaurs.com MADASFOK
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
sithlord
DARK LORDASAUR


Joined: 16 Sep 2008
Posts: 717
Location: Right here

PostPosted: Tue Jun 02, 2009 3:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

MADASFOK


I wasn't implying a Neeson vs Rourke. MADASFOK

Just stating that I think Neeson will be an above average (atleast) Zeus. I may be wrong, but I (or we) won't know til the movie is out. MADASFOK

Rourke isn't in the movie anyways. MADASFOK


End rant.


MADASFOK




*watches new SW trailer.* Cool



*Feels the Darkside flowing through him*
MADASFOK
_________________
Royal GRoyal G Sith's EmperorVader Royal GRoyal G
StormtrooperStormtrooperStormtrooperStormtrooperStormtrooperStormtrooperStormtrooper
StormtrooperStormtrooperStormtrooperStormtrooperStormtrooperStormtrooperStormtrooper
StormtrooperStormtrooperStormtrooperMADASFOKStormtrooperStormtrooperStormtrooper
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Mediasaurusrex
OLD SCHOOL MEDIASAUR PLAYER


Joined: 24 Jul 2003
Posts: 3581

PostPosted: Tue Jun 02, 2009 3:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Of course Rourke isn't a part of the equation.

And you sir, need to feel the manliness of Rourke flowing through you...like the force. I was trying to come up wuith something gayer sounding, but I think that just about sums it up.

I am being silly. The very idea of pitting Rourke against Neeson is like dropping a caterpillar on an red and hive. IT IS A FORGONE CONCLUSION THAT THE CATERPILLAR IS GONNA GET MUNCHED. MADASFOK

Caterpillar = Neeson BTW.
_________________
www.mediasaurs.com MADASFOK
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
sithlord
DARK LORDASAUR


Joined: 16 Sep 2008
Posts: 717
Location: Right here

PostPosted: Tue Jun 02, 2009 3:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Mediasaurusrex wrote:
And you sir, need to feel the manliness of Rourke flowing through you...like the force. I was trying to come up wuith something gayer sounding, but I think that just about sums it up.



Oh great, the last thing I need on my mind, before a trip to San Fransisco is your GAY Rourke sex fantasy with me. MADASFOK

Lovely.


I'm ok with da Darkside.



This is still a great thread. Mr. Green
_________________
Royal GRoyal G Sith's EmperorVader Royal GRoyal G
StormtrooperStormtrooperStormtrooperStormtrooperStormtrooperStormtrooperStormtrooper
StormtrooperStormtrooperStormtrooperStormtrooperStormtrooperStormtrooperStormtrooper
StormtrooperStormtrooperStormtrooperMADASFOKStormtrooperStormtrooperStormtrooper
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Trapani
MCP


Joined: 01 Aug 2008
Posts: 618

PostPosted: Tue Jun 02, 2009 5:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Does this sexual fantasy involve Rourke in a Thor costume using his hammer?

copy and paste this:
MADASFOK

it becomes:
MADASFOK

!!! MADASFOK
_________________
Fokkin managing aircraft and I am mad as fok MADASFOK
In the year 2084, robots came, and we needed BIG F-IN GUNS.


Last edited by Trapani on Tue Jun 02, 2009 5:29 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
sithlord
DARK LORDASAUR


Joined: 16 Sep 2008
Posts: 717
Location: Right here

PostPosted: Tue Jun 02, 2009 5:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

^^^Ahem, I'll have you know, I have a friend nick-named THOR (as he looks alot like him).....so, uh, yeah....gonna have to say NO to that one. Forever.



MADASFOK
_________________
Royal GRoyal G Sith's EmperorVader Royal GRoyal G
StormtrooperStormtrooperStormtrooperStormtrooperStormtrooperStormtrooperStormtrooper
StormtrooperStormtrooperStormtrooperStormtrooperStormtrooperStormtrooperStormtrooper
StormtrooperStormtrooperStormtrooperMADASFOKStormtrooperStormtrooperStormtrooper
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Mediasaurusrex
OLD SCHOOL MEDIASAUR PLAYER


Joined: 24 Jul 2003
Posts: 3581

PostPosted: Tue Jun 02, 2009 5:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Anyone can look like Thor.

But who can look like Rourke?

I am gonna spam Hollywood with a series of emails demanding Rourke be in everything.

Also I am going to demand that they re-shoot WHERE THE WILD THINGS ARE,PUBLIC ENEMIES, and most of the robot CG shots in TRANSFORMERS so that Rourke can act in them. Yes, Optimus is a big robot, but Rourke is about 900x more manly.

We should also consider getting Schwartenfok outta office. ROURKE FOR GOVERNATOR MADASFOK.
_________________
www.mediasaurs.com MADASFOK
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Yellowtailshiraz
Lurker


Joined: 06 Aug 2008
Posts: 35

PostPosted: Wed Jun 17, 2009 7:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

This is a stupid f ucking idea remaking this movie.

What the hell is wrong with people?

That Kraken f ucked me up when I was a kid.

How can they do better?

It is a stupid f ucking idea.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mediasaurusrex
OLD SCHOOL MEDIASAUR PLAYER


Joined: 24 Jul 2003
Posts: 3581

PostPosted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 11:37 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Alright.

March 2010 is coming and there are a GRIP of photos online.

























That shadowy Kraken shot and the Medusa eye are both pretty cool.

There is a lot more in regards to production shots, etc here:

http://clash-of-the-titans-movie-trailer.blogspot.com/
_________________
www.mediasaurs.com MADASFOK
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
sithlord
DARK LORDASAUR


Joined: 16 Sep 2008
Posts: 717
Location: Right here

PostPosted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 8:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

PLZZZZZ don't make it look like Beowulf.


I see they made the 3 stidgeon ( I think that is how it's spelled ) witches more realistic. 3 old blind witches.


The wife and I will see this, but we really like the original.



"Not known to man, but maybe to woman."
_________________
Royal GRoyal G Sith's EmperorVader Royal GRoyal G
StormtrooperStormtrooperStormtrooperStormtrooperStormtrooperStormtrooperStormtrooper
StormtrooperStormtrooperStormtrooperStormtrooperStormtrooperStormtrooperStormtrooper
StormtrooperStormtrooperStormtrooperMADASFOKStormtrooperStormtrooperStormtrooper
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Mediasaurusrex
OLD SCHOOL MEDIASAUR PLAYER


Joined: 24 Jul 2003
Posts: 3581

PostPosted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 8:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Calibos better be HARD AS NAILS.

I mean, since they are stepping to the whole thing, Calibos needs to be completely nightmarish.

He was really something back when the original came out.

Bubo the owl? They should just write that thing out of it. I hope they did, because that stuff was wackjack.

Looks like the Kraken is about the same though.
_________________
www.mediasaurs.com MADASFOK
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
sithlord
DARK LORDASAUR


Joined: 16 Sep 2008
Posts: 717
Location: Right here

PostPosted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 9:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Well, with the updating of technology, the destruction of ARGUS should be top notch. The Kraken should be done justice I hope.....even the original, I thought he was badazzz.
_________________
Royal GRoyal G Sith's EmperorVader Royal GRoyal G
StormtrooperStormtrooperStormtrooperStormtrooperStormtrooperStormtrooperStormtrooper
StormtrooperStormtrooperStormtrooperStormtrooperStormtrooperStormtrooperStormtrooper
StormtrooperStormtrooperStormtrooperMADASFOKStormtrooperStormtrooperStormtrooper
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Trapani
MCP


Joined: 01 Aug 2008
Posts: 618

PostPosted: Wed Nov 04, 2009 10:21 pm    Post subject: Re: CLASH OF THE TITANS Reply with quote

Trapani wrote:

Mediasaurusrex wrote:

Mickey Rourke MADASFOK

Mickey Rourke MADASFOK

Mickey Rourke MADASFOK
_________________
Fokkin managing aircraft and I am mad as fok MADASFOK
In the year 2084, robots came, and we needed BIG F-IN GUNS.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Spinal Villain
METALSAUR


Joined: 18 Sep 2008
Posts: 782
Location: UrAnus.

PostPosted: Thu Nov 05, 2009 12:50 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I agree about Calibos.


The Kraken had better ROOOL!! MADASFOK


REWL I SAID!!! MADASFOK


The only thing that should be more closer to godliness than the Kraken is Smaug.
_________________
Dirtdiver
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
primo
LURKASAUR NUMERO UNO


Joined: 13 Aug 2008
Posts: 51

PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 2:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think that Rourke could make that Bubo the owl good.
_________________
I am not your cousin
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Trapani
MCP


Joined: 01 Aug 2008
Posts: 618

PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 7:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

ROURKE WOULD MAKE EVERYTHING MANLY AS FOK


A while back I just couldn't take the original seriously. I stopped while he was taming the Peggassus.

Too bad, he pulls a number on the Kraken with Medusa's head.
_________________
Fokkin managing aircraft and I am mad as fok MADASFOK
In the year 2084, robots came, and we needed BIG F-IN GUNS.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
primo
LURKASAUR NUMERO UNO


Joined: 13 Aug 2008
Posts: 51

PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 9:43 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I want to see Rourke do Pegasus, with that long flowing mane and prancing and kicking in the air.
_________________
I am not your cousin
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mediasaurusrex
OLD SCHOOL MEDIASAUR PLAYER


Joined: 24 Jul 2003
Posts: 3581

PostPosted: Sun Nov 08, 2009 6:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Rourke could do the whole film hands down and it would rip the very fabric of the concept of film that we know.

I can't sit through the original.

When homegirl sits in the cage and the vulture takes her away I am usually fast asleep.

I was trapped in a hotel room a few years ago and it was on. I tried to watch it and I woke up the next morning late for my appointment.

CONCLUSION?

IT IS A FREAKING LULLABY.
_________________
www.mediasaurs.com MADASFOK
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Mediasaurusrex
OLD SCHOOL MEDIASAUR PLAYER


Joined: 24 Jul 2003
Posts: 3581

PostPosted: Tue Nov 10, 2009 10:31 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Trailer drops today. This should really give us a feel for how bad they slipped up for not making this a Rourke-clone ensemble piece.
_________________
www.mediasaurs.com MADASFOK
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Mediasaurs.com Forum Index -> Movies All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group